Women’s Rights in the Indian Constitution: Promises and Realities

India’s Constitution is widely regarded as one of the most progressive founding documents in the world. Adopted in 1950, it promised every citizen – regardless of gender – equality before the law, freedom from discrimination, and the right to a life of dignity. For Indian women, these were not small promises. They represented a formal break from centuries of legal subjugation. Yet, more than seven decades later, a stark question remains: have these constitutional guarantees translated into lived reality? The answer, as scholars and data both confirm, is complicated – and that complication tells us a great deal about how gender inequality persists even within formally egalitarian systems.

What the Constitution actually says 🔗

The Indian Constitution embeds gender equality across multiple layers – in its Preamble, Fundamental Rights, Directive Principles of State Policy, and Fundamental Duties. The key articles are worth understanding clearly.

Article 14 guarantees every person equality before the law and equal protection of the laws. Article 15(1) prohibits the state from discriminating against any citizen on grounds of sex, among other categories. Article 15(3) goes further, empowering the state to make special provisions for women and children – a constitutional basis for affirmative action. Article 16 ensures equal opportunity in matters of public employment. Meanwhile, Article 39 under the Directive Principles directs the state to ensure equal pay for equal work and to protect the health and strength of workers including women. Article 51A(e) places a fundamental duty on every citizen to renounce practices derogatory to women’s dignity.

These provisions are not peripheral. The Constitution not only grants equality to women but also empowers the state to adopt measures of positive discrimination in favour of women to neutralise cumulative socio-economic and educational disadvantages. India has also ratified the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW), committing itself internationally to equal rights.

On paper, this is a robust framework. In practice, it has proven far easier to write than to enforce.

The gap between constitutional promise and social reality 🔗

India’s legal framework for women’s rights embodies a fundamental contradiction – constitutional equality alongside personal law discrimination, progressive legislation alongside implementation failures. Rights guaranteed to women in the Constitution coexist with a social and legal landscape that frequently undermines them.

Consider employment. Indian women on average earn approximately 64% of what their male counterparts earn for the same occupation and level of qualification. The Equal Remuneration Act of 1976 – now absorbed into the Code on Wages, 2019 – prohibits wage discrimination on the basis of gender, but its impact has been limited. India ranks 127 out of 148 countries in terms of gender pay parity, according to the Global Gender Gap Report 2023. The law’s narrow definition of “same or similar nature” of work fails to account for the systemic undervaluation of female-dominated roles, meaning jobs of equal value to the economy are not protected under equal pay provisions if they are structurally different.

In property and land rights, similar gaps appear. Although equal rights are given to women, land and property rights are weakly enforced in practice, with customary laws widely practiced in rural areas. The 2005 amendment to the Hindu Succession Act gave daughters equal coparcenary rights in ancestral property – a landmark legal change – but its implementation still faces resistance in some parts of the country.

The personal law problem: when religious rules override constitutional rights 🔗

Perhaps the most significant structural barrier to women’s constitutional equality in India is the system of personal laws – religion-specific laws governing marriage, divorce, inheritance, and guardianship. The operation of religious personal laws largely outside the reach of the Constitution has left women vulnerable. Given the patriarchal bias present in all religious personal laws, Indian women cannot fully realise their constitutional right to equality until these laws are reformed.

The tension here is structural, not incidental. All personal laws on marriage, inheritance, and guardianship discriminate against women in some form; yet the debate around a Uniform Civil Code has rarely been framed as a gender justice issue – it is only feminists who consistently pose the question in those terms.

Courts have repeatedly skirted direct confrontation with this issue. Legal scholars note that Indian courts have often avoided testing specific personal law provisions against the constitutional doctrine of equality – either by classifying personal laws as outside the purview of Article 13, by deferring to the legislature, or by ruling on narrow technical grounds rather than declaring discriminatory provisions unconstitutional. The constitutional vision of gender equality faces particular challenges in areas governed by personal religious laws, and the absence of a Uniform Civil Code – despite being mentioned as a Directive Principle under Article 44 – creates a situation where women’s rights to equality may vary based on religious community.

The Supreme Court’s landmark 2017 ruling in Shayara Bano v. Union of India, which struck down instant triple talaq, was a significant step. But it addressed only one specific practice – the broader architecture of personal laws that disadvantages women across religions remains largely intact.

The right against exploitation and its economic blind spots 🔗

Article 23 of the Constitution prohibits trafficking in human beings and forced labour. Article 24 bans child labour in hazardous industries. Together, these provisions form the constitutional right against exploitation. Yet the dominant economic assumptions embedded in these rights – and in the broader constitutional vision of work – reveal a critical gender bias: they largely imagine a formal, wage-based worker who is exploited through pay.

This framing leaves out the most pervasive form of exploitation Indian women face: unpaid domestic labour. A UN report shows that over 51% of the work done by women is unpaid and is not counted in the nation’s GDP or economic statistics. This is not a marginal footnote – it has massive economic consequences. While globally, unpaid domestic work by women is valued at nearly 13% of total economic output, in India, women’s unpaid domestic work is estimated at almost 40% of its current GDP – yet it goes unaccounted as it is not considered productive labour.

India’s National Statistical Organisation Time-Use Survey 2019 found that Indian women spend eight times more hours on unpaid care work than men – a pattern consistent across educational levels and income groups. A NITI Aayog report puts this even higher: women in India spend 9.8 times more time than men on unpaid domestic chores, against a global average of 2.6 times.

This matters constitutionally because the right to equality and the right against exploitation are meaningless to a woman trapped in a cycle of unpaid, unrecognised domestic labour. Unpaid domestic work is not a matter of choice for most women; it is a constraint imposed by patriarchal norms that expect women to carry the full responsibility of the household. It impedes entry into the labour market and restricts women’s income and earning potential.

Social policies and their gender blindness 🔗

State social policies have often replicated, rather than challenged, gendered assumptions. Development programmes – from afforestation drives to rural employment schemes – have historically been designed without accounting for how they affect women’s time and labour. If a conservation policy protects certain forest land but forces women to walk further for firewood, it increases their unpaid labour burden even while appearing neutral on gender. This is what scholars call a “gender-blind” policy – one that treats women as passive beneficiaries rather than active economic actors with specific constraints.

The majority of India’s female workers figure either in poorly remunerated informal sector jobs – without maternity leave, overtime pay, or safe working conditions – or in unpaid roles as primary caregivers in the family. Over 95% of women workers operate within the informal economy, largely without contracts, social security, or legal protection. Their contributions sustain households and supply chains, but are rendered invisible in economic data and policy design.

The constitutional right to equal pay, the Directive Principle on equal remuneration, and the Maternity Benefit Act all exist. But when the economy itself is structured around the assumption that women will absorb the bulk of unpaid care work, formal legal protections address only part of the problem.

Intersectionality: caste, class, and geographic location deepen the gap 🔗

Constitutional rights apply uniformly in theory. In reality, a woman’s experience of those rights is deeply shaped by her caste, religion, class, and geography. Research finds that upper-caste men do the least amount of unpaid work, while upper-caste women engage in the least amount of paid work – with the ratio of women’s paid to unpaid work declining as family wealth increases, and the gap becoming steeper higher up the caste hierarchy in rural India.

The intersectionality of gender with caste, religion, economic status, and geographic location creates layered vulnerabilities that constitutional provisions alone struggle to address. A Dalit woman in rural Rajasthan faces a fundamentally different set of barriers to her constitutional rights than an upper-caste urban professional – even if both hold the same formal entitlements under Articles 14, 15, and 16.

What has changed – and what hasn’t 🔗

It would be unfair to suggest nothing has changed. Judicial interpretation has expanded the scope of constitutional protections significantly. The Supreme Court’s rulings on workplace sexual harassment (leading to the POSH Act, 2013), on the equal property rights of daughters, and on triple talaq have all used constitutional provisions to advance women’s rights in meaningful ways. India passed the 73rd and 74th Constitutional Amendments in 1993, which provide for 33% quotas for women’s representation in local self-government institutions – a structural intervention that has brought millions of women into formal political decision-making for the first time.

Yet the gap between legal rights and lived realities for most Indian women remains vast. Constitutional rights require legislation to enact them, institutions to enforce them, and social transformation to make them meaningful. When patriarchal structures persist in homes, workplaces, courts, and communities, formal equality becomes an insufficient tool.

The structure of family and social norms built around women are often directly at odds with the principle of equality guaranteed by the Constitution. The system of gender-based inequality – patriarchy – retards the growth of women’s personality and affects them mentally, socially, and psychologically. Constitutional rights can challenge these structures; they cannot, by themselves, dismantle them.

The Indian Constitution made extraordinary promises to women in 1950. The ongoing task – legal, political, economic, and cultural – is to make those promises real.

What do you think? If constitutional rights alone are not enough to achieve gender equality, what additional changes – in law, policy, or social norms – are most urgently needed in India? And how should the state address the economic invisibility of women’s unpaid domestic labour – should it be formally recognised, compensated, or redistributed?

References

1. https://lawbhoomi.com/constitutional-provisions-for-women-in-india/
2. https://mospi.gov.in/sites/default/files/reports_and_publication/cso_social_statices_division/Constitutional&Legal_Rights.pdf
3. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender_inequality_in_India
4. https://www.legalserviceindia.com/Legal-Articles/women-and-the-legal-system-in-india-laws-loopholes-and-the-pursuit-of-justice/
5. https://www.ibanet.org/rethinking-Indian-law-on-equal-pay-towards-gender-pay-equality-in-workplace
6. https://divorcebylaw.com/indian-laws-on-womens-rights/
7. https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1215&context=ilj
8. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/24730580.2018.1453750
9. https://thelaw.institute/law-and-vulnerable-groups/constitutional-gender-equality-indian-perspective/
10. https://feminisminindia.com/2017/09/04/unpaid-domestic-labour/
11. https://thediplomat.com/2020/11/indias-women-bear-the-burden-of-unpaid-work-with-costs-to-themselves-and-the-economy/
12. https://www.orfonline.org/research/building-india-s-economy-on-the-backs-of-women-s-unpaid-work-a-gendered-analysis-of-time-use-data
13. https://idronline.org/article/gender/whats-going-on-with-indias-female-labour-force-participation/
14. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-020-0488-2
15. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S245229292400050X
16. https://socio.health/women-in-economy/women-india-informal-economy-contributions-struggles/
17. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/SSRN_ID3688004_code1575752.pdf?abstractid=3688004