Intersectionality’s Role in Understanding Self and Nation Amidst Social Movements

How do we understand who we are – and how does that understanding connect to the world we live in? These questions sit at the heart of intersectionality, a framework that has moved far beyond academic debate to reshape how social movements fight for justice, how policies get written, and how educators teach. At its core, intersectionality insists that identity is never simple. Race, gender, class, nationality, and sexuality don’t operate in isolation – they overlap, reinforce each other, and together produce experiences that no single category can explain on its own.

From theory to the world: how intersectionality took root 🔗

Intersectionality as a named concept was introduced by legal scholar Kimberlé Crenshaw in her 1989 article Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex. Crenshaw developed it to explain why Black women’s experiences of discrimination couldn’t be captured by looking at race alone, or gender alone. Two years later, in Mapping the Margins, she applied the framework to expose how advocacy around violence against women overlooked the particular vulnerabilities of women of color, especially those from immigrant and socially disadvantaged communities.

What began as a legal argument quickly expanded. The concept broadened to include a wide spectrum of social classifications – socioeconomic class, sexual orientation, age, disability, and more – emphasizing that these dimensions of identity are not isolated from one another but intertwine to create distinct advantages or disadvantages. Today, intersectionality is applied across sociology, political science, health research, education, and law. Its reach into social movements and public policy reflects just how urgently it addresses real, lived conditions of inequality.

Questions of self: identity at the intersection 🔗

One of intersectionality’s most important contributions is the way it reframes questions of self. Who am I? is never answered by a single identity marker. A person who is, say, a Black immigrant woman with a disability doesn’t experience each of those identities separately – they experience all of them simultaneously, and that combination creates a specific social location that cannot be reduced to any one part.

Intersectional theory asserts that people are often disadvantaged by multiple sources of oppression – race, class, gender identity, sexual orientation, religion, and other identity markers – and that these markers do not exist independently of each other; each informs the others, often creating a complex convergence of oppression.

This understanding of selfhood has direct implications for social justice work. Intersectional thinking has opened the way to more inclusive and coalitional social movements and agendas precisely because it pushes activists and organizers to account for the full complexity of the people they seek to serve. When a movement centers only the most visible or least marginalized within its ranks, it inevitably leaves others behind. The intersectional lens demands something harder and more honest: that we account for the specific barriers faced by those at multiple intersections of disadvantage.

Questions of nation: intersectionality beyond the individual 🔗

Intersectionality also reshapes how we think about national identity and belonging. The concept of “nation” is rarely neutral – it carries histories of colonialism, racial hierarchies, immigration control, and gendered citizenship. W. E. B. Du Bois theorized that the intersectional paradigms of race, class, and nation might explain specific aspects of the Black political economy, demonstrating early on that national belonging is always filtered through other axes of power.

More recently, scholars have extended this analysis globally. Maria Lugones introduced the concept of the “coloniality of gender” to explore how colonial histories intersect across race, gender, and class, creating unique forms of oppression for Indigenous and Afro-descendant women – revealing how the imposition of Eurocentric gender norms during colonial rule marginalized non-Western gender identities and social structures.

Crenshaw argued that “structural intersectionality” among forms of oppression based on race, gender, class, and national origin – emanating from both the state and intimate relations – put immigrant women of color at most risk of violence. National policies around immigration, welfare, and citizenship thus cannot be evaluated without an intersectional lens. A policy that appears gender-neutral or racially neutral on paper can still produce deeply unequal outcomes when its effects are traced across intersecting identities.

Intersectionality in social movements and human rights advocacy 🔗

Social movements have increasingly adopted intersectional frameworks to strengthen their organizing and policy demands. The reproductive justice movement is a clear example. What started as a primarily pro-choice movement has been transformed by intersectional analysis. The reproductive justice movement went beyond abortion rights and incorporated intersectionality to address issues of access to reproductive health care, immigrants’ rights, LGBTQ+ rights, and sex worker rights – incorporating the reproductive oppression of women of color, immigrants, and others in vulnerable situations.

At the international level, intersectionality has become central to human rights law, anchored in the principle of non-discrimination guaranteed under a wide range of international instruments – including the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination.

The Center for Intersectionality and Social Policy Studies at Columbia Law School was established in 2011 as a global hub for developing intersectionality as both a theoretical framework and a practice in law, human rights, and social justice advocacy – bringing together scholars and practitioners across law, sociology, feminist studies, and other fields to shape more effective remedies and promote greater collaboration between social movements.

Despite this growth, the path from theory to practice remains uneven. While policymakers progressively recognize intersecting inequalities in policy planning, the difficulties of translating intersectionality into actual practice still represent a major challenge – particularly when institutional structures remain organized around single-issue or single-identity categories.

Nancy Naples and the pedagogical possibilities of intersectionality 🔗

One of the most important questions intersectionality raises is not just what it teaches, but how it should be taught. Sociologist Nancy Naples, a professor at the University of Connecticut, has been central to answering that question. Her work explores the pedagogical possibilities of intersectionality – how it can be taught in ways that are themselves intersectional.

In her chapter Pedagogical Practice and Teaching Intersectionality Intersectionally, published in the edited volume Intersectional Pedagogy: Complicating Identity and Social Justice, Naples reflects on decades of teaching feminist theory and gender studies. She argues that as intersectionality became institutionalized in the academy, there was a displacement of praxis as the central force driving its articulation – and that for contemporary feminist studies scholars and teachers, intersectionality must be more than a theoretical lens; it must animate pedagogical practice itself.

Naples traces how intersectional frameworks moved beyond what she calls the embodied approach – focused on the lived experiences of specific groups – to encompass social movement strategies and decolonizing methodologies. This evolution reflects the broader trajectory of the concept: from a tool for naming personal experience to a framework for structural analysis and collective action.

The theory-practice gap in intersectional pedagogy 🔗

A recurring challenge in intersectional education is the gap between learning the theory and applying it. Research on how intersectionality is used in educational leadership pedagogy found three major problems: an additive approach was taken (treating identities as simply added together rather than interacting), there was an unclear connection between theory and practice, and there was minimal attention given to the role of agency in social justice leadership.

Simply naming multiple identities is not intersectional analysis. Intersectionality is meant to be applied to real-world problems, and its core approach prioritizes praxis – the mutualism between theory, research, personal experiences, and practice. Naples pushes educators to move beyond listing identity categories and toward examining how structural power operates across those categories simultaneously. This means designing classroom environments and curricula that actually reflect that complexity – not just describing it.

Intersectional pedagogy and social justice struggles 🔗

An intersectional feminist approach focuses on how social, economic, and political forces impact women and their experiences, and teaching this effectively requires educators to engage not just with texts but with the structural realities those texts describe. Naples emphasizes that feminist educators must integrate intersectionality as a pedagogical orientation – critically reflecting on their own teaching and curricular decisions to create more inclusive learning environments.

In public and private education, intersectionality has the potential to profoundly affect pedagogy, curricular development, and educational policy. When intersectional pedagogy is done well, it helps students understand how violence, inequality, and injustice are not isolated events but products of overlapping systems – and it equips them to act on that understanding.

Intersectionality and the fight against gender-based violence 🔗

One of intersectionality’s most consequential applications is in understanding and addressing gender-based violence. Crenshaw’s original analysis of domestic violence showed that anti-violence frameworks that treated all women as the same failed women of color – whose experiences were shaped by racism, immigration status, and economic precarity in addition to gender.

Violence against women of color is affected by the intersection of racism and sexism, and the failures of both the feminist and antiracist movements to seriously address this issue have left many women without adequate protection or recourse.

Today, organizations working on gender-based violence increasingly apply intersectional frameworks to their direct services, legal advocacy, and policy work. Intersectionality can highlight the overlap of oppressive systems – racism, classism, ableism, sexism, and xenophobia – to investigate the root causes of gender-based violence and other forms of oppression, and without an intersectional framework, a truly trauma-informed approach to serving survivors is not possible.

From the classroom to the streets: theory and practice together 🔗

The most enduring insight of intersectionality may be that the personal and the political cannot be separated. Questions of self – who I am, how I am seen, what I can access – are always also questions of nation, policy, and power. Social movements that ignore this risk reproducing the very exclusions they set out to challenge.

An intersectional approach allows social justice leaders to focus on solutions informed by the experiences and voices of those most affected; it engages new audiences in ways that resonate with their experiences and values, and supports the leadership of people at multiple intersections of disadvantage. That connection – between lived experience, scholarly analysis, classroom pedagogy, and activist practice – is precisely what makes intersectionality not just a theory, but a tool for transformation.

Intersectionality has the potential to prompt policymakers and practitioners to expand their analytical frames to see how social problems affect all members of a targeted group – not just the most visible or prototypical members – making visible the groups that single-axis policies and programs often exclude. That visibility is the first step toward justice.

What do you think? When social movements or policy frameworks claim to be intersectional, what would it actually look like for them to center the voices and needs of those facing the most overlapping forms of marginalization – rather than focusing on the experiences of the least marginalized within a group? And how should educators balance teaching intersectionality as a theoretical framework while ensuring it remains grounded in the real-world struggles it was designed to address?

References

1. https://www.britannica.com/topic/intersectionality
2. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4181947/
3. https://researchguides.library.syr.edu/fys101/intersectionality
4. https://www.aaup.org/article/what-intersectionality-and-why-it-important
5. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intersectionality
6. https://opportunityagenda.org/messaging_reports/ten-tips-for-intersectionality/
7. https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/documents/issues/minorities/30th-anniversary/2022-09-22/GuidanceNoteonIntersectionality.pdf
8. https://intersectionality.law.columbia.edu/
9. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17405904.2023.2228937
10. https://sociology.uconn.edu/person/nancy-naples/
11. https://www.routledge.com/Intersectional-Pedagogy-Complicating-Identity-and-Social-Justice-1st/Case/p/book/9781315672793
12. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315672793-6/pedagogical-practice-teaching-intersectionality-intersectionally-nancy-naples
13. https://www.ualberta.ca/en/institute-intersectionality-studies/media-library/intersectionality-readings/chapter_6_pedagogical_practice_and_teaching_intersectionality_intersec….pdf
14. https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1013&context=intersections
15. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10445436/
16. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/248994887_Teaching_Intersectionality_Intersectionally
17. https://stoprelationshipabuse.org/action/intersectionality-violence-against-women-of-color/
18. https://www.tahirih.org/news/understanding-intersectionality-overlapping-identities-and-obstacles/